6-Pack Challenge
A measured body recomposition experiment under real travel and workload constraints—focused on visible progress as a byproduct of consistent training, recovery, and simple nutrition.
Not a transformation gimmick. A repeatable system.
What success means (clear, non-hype)
-
Visible recomposition without extreme dieting
-
Strength maintained or improved
-
Travel weeks don’t break the system
-
Metrics tracked honestly (even when imperfect)
The System
Strength (non-negotiable)
- 2–3 sessions/week
- full body
- simple movements
Nutrition (boring on purpose)
- protein-first
- consistent meal timing
- “reduce decisions”
Recovery (multiplier)
- + sleep
- – stress
- + steps
- = deloaded weeks
Challenge Rules (what stays consistent)
Training minimums
Goal: protect lean mass, improve posture/shape, and keep the “6-pack” outcome tied to performance—not starvation.
Minimum standard: 2 strength sessions per week
- 10–30 minutes counts (the “minimum effective dose” is valid)
If travel week explodes: 2×10 minutes beats “nothing”
Session structure (simple + repeatable)
Each session hits:
- Legs (squat / hinge)
- Push (push-up / press)
- Pull (row / pull-down / band row)
- Core (anti-extension + anti-rotation)
Recommended “travel-proof menu”
Hotel / bodyweight options are fully acceptable:
- Split squats or goblet squats
- Push-ups (incline if needed)
- Row (band / suitcase / machine)
- Plank + dead bug (core)
Keep exercises boring. Progress comes from repetition, not novelty.
Progress rule
Aim for small progress each week:
- +1 rep, +1 set, slower tempo, or slightly heavier load
- If performance drops for multiple sessions → it’s usually a recovery issue, not motivation.
Cardio minimums (VO₂ max and endurance engine)
Goal: build a travel-proof aerobic base, improve VO₂ max over time, and keep intensity structured—not chaotic.
Weekly minimum: 4 cardio sessions per week
80/20 split
- ~80% Zone 2 (easy aerobic)
- ~20% Zone 4/5 (hard work)
How I define my zones (Fitbit HR + pace + effort)
My baseline is Fitbit HR zones (Fitbit Charge 5). I cross-check with pace and effort so the training stays honest even if travel, fatigue, or heat shifts HR.
Zone 2 (easy aerobic)
Primary: Fitbit Zone 2
Cross-check:
- I can speak in full sentences
- RPE: 3–4/10
- Pace feels “too easy” at the start
Purpose: base building, recovery support, fat-oxidation capacity, travel durability
Zone 4/5 (hard sessions)
Primary: Fitbit Zones 4 and 5
- Cross-check:
- speaking becomes hard (short phrases only)
- RPE: 8–9/10
Purpose: VO₂ max stimulus, speed maintenance, performance resilience
How I execute the 80/20 split (simple template)
Zone 2 sessions (3x/week)
- 30–60 minutes
- Keep it controlled; the win is consistency
Hard session (1x/week: Zone 4/5)
Pick one and repeat (repeatability beats novelty):
- 6×2 minutes hard / 2 minutes easy
- 10×1 minute hard / 1 minute easy
Warm-up + cool-down required (even if short).
VO₂ max integration (Fitbit + Strava)
I treat VO₂ max as a trend signal, not a trophy.
I log VO₂ max and the context of the week:
- travel stress, sleep quality, volume consistency, and the intensity dose
If VO₂ max stalls or drops:
- first check sleep + recovery + consistency
- then check if the hard session has been too hard (or skipped)
Device accuracy note (honesty + sponsor-friendly)
Fitbit and Strava estimates are useful for trends, but a more precise device (chest strap / higher-end watch) could improve accuracy. Until then, I rely on HR zones + pace + effort to keep the training intent correct.
Travel-week override (minimum viable version)
If time collapses:
keep 2 Zone 2 sessions + 1 short interval session
Even 20–25 minutes counts if it preserves the weekly pattern.
Example week:
3× Zone 2 (30–60 min) + 1× intervals (Zone 4/5) + strength minimums + steps protected on travel days.
Movement baseline (steps are the hidden lever)
Goal: keep daily energy turnover stable and prevent travel days from turning sedentary.
Minimum standard
- Make walking intentional on travel days
- “I walked because I had to” doesn’t count as a strategy—I schedule it.
Simple targets
Normal days: aim for a meaningful baseline (your choice)
Travel days: use the rule:
- two 10–15 minute walks minimum (morning + afternoon/evening)
- airports: walk the terminal on purpose (it’s free cardio)
Why this matters
Steps protect your baseline even when training gets disrupted.
It’s the most reliable “consistency signal” during chaotic weeks.
Nutrition principles (boring on purpose)
Goal: recomposition without diet drama.
Default rules
Protein-first when I eat
Keep the first meal simple
Reduce decisions:
- choose 1–2 “safe meals” I can order anywhere
Don’t “compensate” emotionally after travel meals—return to baseline next meal.
Practical structure
If I’m hungrier due to training: I increase food intentionally, not randomly.
If I’m less active during travel: I keep meals simpler and avoid grazing.
Red-flag behavior
If I start negotiating with myself all day about food, I return to:
- hydrate
- walk
- protein-first
- simple meals
Fasting as a tool (not religion) + progress checks
Goal: fasting helps when it simplifies; it’s not the point of the challenge.
Fasting rule
I use fasting when it reduces friction:
- travel mornings, busy meeting days, decision-fatigue days
I adjust if it harms:
- sleep quality
- training quality
- mood stability over multiple days
Progress checks (trend-based)
Weekly check-in, not daily obsession:
- waist trend (primary)
- weight trend (secondary)
- training consistency (non-negotiable)
- VO₂ max trend (signal)
I track trends and behavior quality—not perfect weeks.
“Honesty clause”
If a week is messy, I document it.
Sponsors and readers don’t need perfection; they need repeatability.
Intensity is a spice, not the meal — I earn hard sessions with consistent Zone 2, then I measure the trend (VO₂ max + recovery) instead of chasing a number.
Proof Library (Field Notes)
Real weeks. Real travel. Real constraints. These posts are the receipts behind recomposition.
Start with the post that matches your reality: travel week, strength week, or recovery week.
Signals of change
- The Suit Got Too Big: When Recomposition Became Obvious
Strength + structure
- Post-Race Pivot: Less Mileage, More Strength (Muscle Retention Mode)
- Hotel Room Strength: My Minimum Effective Dose
Travel weeks (recomposition under stress)
- Airport Protocol: Consistency Without Willpower Battles
- Travel Week Field Note: How I Keep the System Alive
Origin & commitment
- Why I Started Wellness by Michael Tomasini (and how I’ll keep it honest)
Experiments
- The 49-Hour Fast: Testing the Wall (and Finding the Edge)
Cardio engine (VO₂ max + 80/20)
- Fasted Running in Real Life: Zone 2 Base + One Hard Session
- Race Proof: Fasted Half Marathon Lessons That Changed My Training
Partner Fit
The 6-Pack Challenge is built for brands that reduce friction and improve measurable outcomes under real travel constraints. I integrate products only when they fit the system and can be documented transparently.
- Wearables (sleep, recovery, HR zones, VO₂ max trends)
- Strength tools (bands, adjustable dumbbells, minimalist training gear)
- Athletic apparel / shoes (travel-proof training)
- Hydration / electrolytes (training + travel days)
- Hotels (gym quality, sleep environment, consistency support)
Partnership Formats
- 2–3 week field test (product in real travel weeks)
- One travel-week integration (airport → hotel → meetings)
- 8–10 week build (measured progress with a simple summary)
Deliverables are defined up front and reported using native platform analytics plus documented field notes.
Work With Me
If your brand supports measurable performance—sleep, recovery, strength, or travel-proof consistency—I’m open to partnerships that can be tested in real conditions and documented transparently. The goal is repeatable results, not hype.
Best-fit partners: wearables, strength tools, athletic apparel, hydration, and travel-friendly hotels.
What partners receive:
- Clear deliverables (content + timeline)
- Real-world testing under travel constraints
- Simple performance summary using native platform analytics
Consistency is the product test. Travel is the lab.
